Throw 100 cyber-hornets into a voting booth and they will sting each other to death with 100 viewpoints. Throw 100 cyber-hornets into a room with a Bitcoin-hater like Nassim Taleb (who personally attacks Lyn Alden???) and we will sting him to insanity. That’s the power we have if we become a singular force for advancing Bitcoin. Enough with the Red versus Blue. It’s time for the Orange Party.
“Fix the Money, Fix the World.” Well, our politicians want us focused on the minutiae of fixing the world while they degrade our money and steal our wealth.
FULL STOP. Let’s fix the money first, then we can get back to bickering about red versus blue policies. Just maybe, in the process of fixing the money we may find out that many of the policies we fought over have resolved themselves or have had their impacts reduced. Just maybe, our society can become more civil in the process. How do we get there?
“Bitcoin” needs to act like a honey badger, not just in the monetary and network arenas but also in the political field of battle. The reason an animal shows its force prior to conflict is to demonstrate the pain that might befall its aggressor if an attack is undertaken. If cooler heads don’t prevail, both can be wounded and, in some cases, mortally so. Therefore, most animal engagements start and end with these modes of communication – snarls and aggression displays.
What am I saying here? We don’t need Karens screeching into the phone demanding to speak with their senator. What we need is 10,000 Chads and Staceys calmly explaining to their senators the virtues of innovation, human freedoms, and financial inclusivity. Our snarl is to make them hear your reasoned arguments. Our aggressive display is to make them understand you will donate to those that back Bitcoin, irrespective of political affiliation.
That’s right, irrespective of political affiliation. This will imprint into their brains that we are political mercenaries that will flow money into the coffers of Bitcoin-friendly politicians. That’s the way to make this go bipartisan faster.
Look at the “infrastructure” bill’s waste and payouts to buy votes. This bill was written by lobbyists and paid for by our future.
We don’t have an army of lobbyers yet, but what we do have is an estimated 46 million Americans that own bitcoin.
Granted, most probably don’t have the passion or knowledge we have, but as Number Go Up Technology takes off they will be forced to care. We need politicians to understand now that when they threaten Bitcoin miners, developers, wallets, and nodes, then they threaten ALL OF US.
When a honey badger is threatened, it SHOWS its aggressor that it means business and backs it up, tearing the aggressor apart without remorse. It’s time we show our politicians what we are.
Call.
Email.
Letters.
Twitter.
Everything.
Constantly.
Andy Edstrom is showing the way.
This is a guest post by Bitcoin&Bald. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.

Throw 100 cyber-hornets right into a voting sales space and they’ll sting one another to dying with 100 viewpoints. Throw 100 cyber-hornets right into a room with a Bitcoin-hater like Nassim Taleb (who personally assaults Lyn Alden???) and we’ll sting him to madness. That’s the facility we now have if we change into a singular power for advancing Bitcoin. Sufficient with the Pink versus Blue. It’s time for the Orange Celebration.
“Repair the Cash, Repair the World.” Properly, our flesh pressers need us centered on the trivia of fixing the world whereas they degrade our cash and steal our wealth.
FULL STOP. Let’s repair the cash first, then we are able to get again to bickering about pink versus blue insurance policies. Simply possibly, within the strategy of fixing the cash we could discover out that most of the insurance policies we fought over have resolved themselves or have had their impacts diminished. Simply possibly, our society can change into extra civil within the course of. How will we get there?
“Bitcoin” must act like a honey badger, not simply within the financial and community arenas but in addition within the political area of battle. The rationale an animal reveals its power previous to battle is to reveal the ache which may befall its aggressor if an assault is undertaken. If cooler heads don’t prevail, each could be wounded and, in some circumstances, mortally so. Due to this fact, most animal engagements begin and finish with these modes of communication – snarls and aggression shows.
What am I saying right here? We don’t want Karens screeching into the cellphone demanding to talk with their senator. What we want is 10,000 Chads and Staceys calmly explaining to their senators the virtues of innovation, human freedoms, and monetary inclusivity. Our snarl is to make them hear your reasoned arguments. Our aggressive show is to make them perceive you’ll donate to those who again Bitcoin, regardless of political affiliation.
That’s proper, regardless of political affiliation. This can imprint into their brains that we’re political mercenaries that can move cash into the coffers of Bitcoin-friendly politicians. That’s the way in which to make this go bipartisan quicker.
Have a look at the “infrastructure” invoice’s waste and payouts to purchase votes. This invoice was written by lobbyists and paid for by our future.
We don’t have a military of lobbyers but, however what we do have is an estimated 46 million People that personal bitcoin.
Granted, likely don’t have the eagerness or data we now have, however as Quantity Go Up Expertise takes off they are going to be pressured to care. We’d like politicians to know now that after they threaten Bitcoin miners, builders, wallets, and nodes, then they threaten ALL OF US.
When a honey badger is threatened, it SHOWS its aggressor that it means enterprise and backs it up, tearing the aggressor aside with out regret. It’s time we present our flesh pressers what we’re.
Name.
E-mail.
Letters.
Twitter.
Every little thing.
Continuously.
Andy Edstrom is exhibiting the way in which.
It is a visitor submit by Bitcoin&Bald. Opinions expressed are fully their very own and don’t essentially replicate these of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Journal.